Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:07

Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Neurosteroids identified as potential therapy for treatment-resistant depression - Medical Xpress
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
You Can Now Launch First-Party PlayStation Games Through the Xbox PC App - Push Square
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why do North Indians, living in Bangalore, not bother to learn Kannada?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Three observations from Real Madrid’s 3-1 win vs Pachuca - Managing Madrid
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Why Fans Think Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Might Already Be Married - instyle.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
MindsEye team deploys first hotfix as they scramble to make the dang thing work - Polygon
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How does Google Gemini 2.0 work?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?